Blog

Key Search Terms – Seat Size, Playing Time, Pro Sports

It is a common practice to use website tracking tools to identify search terms that drive people to a website or blog. Such an analysis was completed for this site as part of a move from a previous service provider.

The terms were grouped into categories and the top three search term concepts were:

  • Equal playing time.
  • The purpose of professional sports.
  • The size of stadium seats.

These search terms may not be representative of the beliefs of society as a whole; however, they are clearly issues that are relevant to society. The irony is that only a small portion of articles on this site address these topics.

Equal playing time has been a hot button for a number of years. Some parents feel equal playing time is necessary so their children, and all kids, can have an equal opportunity to improve. At the same time equal playing time prevents better and more dedicated athletes from getting the playing time they have earned though hard work. Parents are interested in understanding the arguments that can be made for and against equal playing time.

The purpose of professional sports is questioned by society every day. A look at attendance and revenue figures for professional sports teams shows that Americans love sports, yet they have become concerned about the purpose of sports because there is never ending media coverage of issues such as substance abuse, the concussion epidemic, compensation that seems to be exorbitant, cheating, scandals, and poor sportsmanship. It is difficult for some to come to terms with the fact that professional sports are the ultimate form of entertainment.

Seat size is obviously a major topic for the owners of arenas, stadiums, and event centers. Over time the weight of average Americans has increased significantly and stadium seats have been made wider to accommodate spectators. Has this gain in weight and the accompanying increase in the size of American derrieres caused a greater interest in the size of seats at local sports arenas?

It is understandable why the first two topics were included as hot topics in website searches; however, the volume of searches for seat size is more puzzling.

What search terms/concepts are going to be at the top of the list during the next year?

Stay tuned. It should be interesting.

Mazza – Too Beautiful to Write for Huffington Post?

Is Ed Mazza too beautiful to write for the Huffington Post?

July 27th was  a slow day in the news room for Mr. Mazza. At 11:23 pm EDT he posted an online article titled “Sabina Altynbekova Is Too Beautiful To Play Volleyball, Critics Say”. Readers waited on pins and needles for additional details and at 2:59 pm EDT Mazza updated the original article.

For a moment, July 27th felt like nirvana. Worries about Vladimir Putin invading Ukraine disappeared, it was irrelevant whether Israel was going to blow the Gaza Strip to Kingdom Come, and it just didn’t matter how bad the CU Buffs were going to embarrass the state of Colorado this upcoming football season.

At 11:23 on July 27th, the world was a happy place. People everywhere were focused on whether Sabina Altynbekova was really too beautiful to play volleyball on Kazakhstan’s national team. When Mazza’s update rolled in at 2:59 the world stopped long enough for enemies to set aside their guns, nerve gas, and bombs and take a few minutes to Google Sabina Altynbekova.

The results of their Google searches were provided in an online poll:

  • 48.3% of the respondents would have to stand on a stepstool to see eye-to-eye with Ms. Altynbekova.
  • 34.7% thought Kazakhstan was a suburb of Detroit.
  • 41.7% thought a float serve was what happened when the waiter delivered a root beer float at a Sonic Drive-In.
  • 97.3% thought Ms. Altynbekova was beautiful and 2.7% indicated they were scheduled to visit their ophthalmologists to get new glasses the following day.
  • 69.0% indicated they had never played volleyball before, but planned to enroll in a beginner’s class the following day.

Thank you Ed Mazza for writing an article that had absolutely no value what so ever. It was a pleasant change of pace, even if it made a few people grimace. You made a lot of people smile  and making people smile is a good thing! It is kind of like being too beautiful to play volleyball or write for the Huffington Post?

Gladys Heldman – A Daughter’s Perspective

The French Open and Wimbledon have recently finished and the world’s top players are focused on the U.S. Open and the tournaments leading up to it.

So far this year Li Na, Maria Sharapova, and Petra Kvitova have each won a Grand Slam. Given the depth of the women’s pro tour, there will likely be a different winner for the U.S. Open.

If Gladys Heldman was alive today, she would look on with pride and amazement at the accomplishments of these women. You see, she was responsible for laying the foundation for the women’s pro tour almost 50 years ago.

In 2012, the WTA recognized her significant contributions to women’s tennis by posthumously honoring her with the Georgina Clark Mother Award. Not only did Heldman change tennis, but she played a role in advancing the importance of women in business and society.

Periodically, it is important to note the accomplishments and battles that have been fought by those who preceded us, whether it is in sports, business, or life. Individuals such as Heldman made the sport of tennis and life better for generations to come. All athletes and sports fans who enjoy women’s professional tennis owe a debt of gratitude to Gladys Heldman.

The following is the text of the acceptance speech given by her daughter Julie Heldman at the WTA award ceremony.

“Thank you for honoring my mother with the Georgina Clark Mother Award. This award is certainly not because Gladys Heldman was a traditional mother. She was unapologetically unconventional. She didn’t cook, she didn’t clean, she didn’t vacuum. She was uninterested in makeup and frilly dresses. But she was a helluva role model. She taught us to value education and success, she was committed to helping others, and she stood up for what she believed in.

This weekend we are celebrating the founding of the Family Circle Cup and the founding of the women’s pro tour. My mother had a role in the founding of this tournament, and she was the driving force, the shepherd, and the guiding light for the beginning of the women’s pro tour. Yet my mother never took a dime from women’s tennis. In fact she dug deep into her own pocket.

Here’s why she was uniquely qualified to be the founder of the modern women’s tennis tour:

She was extraordinarily hard working. She graduated from Stanford in three years, at the top of her class. In 1953, she started, owned, edited, and published World Tennis, which became the world’s largest and most influential tennis magazine. When she sold the magazine in 1972, she liked to say she was replaced by seven men. That’s probably true.

She was committed to unlimited opportunities for women. In the 1950s, she was often asked “Isn’t it nice your husband lets you work?” My father was a distinguished scientist and businessman who had married a force of nature, and nothing was stopping her.

She had a bully pulpit. For years she used her editorial pages to campaign for open tennis, and when that battle was won in 1968, she championed women’s tennis, calling for more tournaments and bigger prize money for the women pros.

She was a self starter who was driven to succeed. She had no experience in journalism, but she taught herself to write and edit articles and to sell ads, the life blood of magazines. I remember her each month going without sleep for days, typing furiously, chain-smoking cigarettes, and laying out articles all over her bed, all to send the magazine to press on time. She was never one day late.

She was a phenomenal, creative promoter who batted 1,000. Her most successful promotion before the women’s pro tour was the 1962 US Championships at Forest Hills. The field had been weak for years, because top tennis players were playing in Europe for bigger under-the-table money. No one knew how to solve the problem. So Gladys took over. She and a group of friends ponied up enough money to jet the players in from Europe and treat them like kings. The tournament was a huge success. She saved Forest Hills.

She focused on the goal and didn’t back down, even when she ruffled feathers. The Forest Hills promotion is a perfect example. The men who ran the United States Lawn Tennis Association resented her coming in and doing a better job than they had. After her astonishing success, they kicked her out. She succeeded in part because she was headstrong and sometimes difficult.

She knew everyone in tennis. She attracted advertisers by cold-calling the heads of big companies. If she struck out, she’d go to Tiffany’s and buy herself something expensive. She owned three gold cigarette lighters, but she also got lots of ads and lots of business connections.  She brought Joe Cullman, Chairman of the Board of Phillip Morris, into tennis, and his company became a major presence.

She was dedicated to helping tennis players. Without any publicity, she paid for players who couldn’t afford to compete. At a time when opportunities were few for players of color, she reached out a hand to those in need. All of these traits came in handy when she founded the women’s pro tour.

Her work ethic led her to ignore her busy schedule and help the women players. At Forest Hills in 1970, the women were furious that the upcoming Los Angeles tournament had a prize money ratio of 8 to 1 in favor of the men. Billie Jean King, Rosie Casals and Nancy Richey approached my mother, asking her to help start a competing event. My mother had a magazine to run, there were people from far and wide to meet at the Open, and my parents were in the process of moving from New York City to Houston. Yet when she heard the women’s cry for help, she jumped into action.

She started immediately. Within days she gained verbal permission from the men in power, contacted people in Houston to run the tournament, and rounded up the players. Yet when the Houston tournament was about to start, the men in power made an about face, threatening to suspend any player who competed in Houston. Those suspensions could cause havoc for the players and the club. So Gladys reassured them all.

Her creativity as a promoter led to a unique solution. In 1970 the rules distinguishing amateurs and pros were complex. To make the tournament work, my mother creatively made all the players contract pros for one week by signing them up for $1. That solution protected the players and the club.

Her connection to Joe Cullman was vital. She called him and got Virginia Slims, his company’s new women’s brand, to support the tournament.

That first event was a great success. The nine of us stood up for ourselves and for women’s tennis. Virginia Slims had a public relations coup. And after the finals, the Original 9 ate spaghetti dinner at our house and then chose my mother to head a women’s pro tour. Before the lights were out that night, she attacked her Rolodex, contacting anyone vaguely capable of promoting or sponsoring a women’s pro tournament. She signed up Virginia Slims to be the tour sponsor. And she never stopped reaching out to women players, supporting those who had already committed to the Virginia Slims tour, and enticing those who hadn’t.

For the next two-and-a-half years, my mother was the force behind the scenes, and Billie Jean King was the tour’s greatest star, without whom the tour would not have succeeded. And the rest of us players worked hard, putting our careers and the future of women’s tennis on the line.

Yet some of my mother’s strengths were also her downfall. Those years were a rough go for her. She was still running World Tennis. There were fights with tennis associations and unreliable promoters, and it took a huge toll on her. And then she was booted out of women’s pro tennis when the Virginia Slims Tour agreed to combine with the rival USLTA women’s tennis tour. Why? She was outspoken, she was mercurial, and she was difficult.

Thank heavens Gladys Heldman was difficult. It meant she stood up for the things she believed in. It meant she wouldn’t back down. It means she and the Original 9 players started what has become the most successful women’s pro tour in all of sports.

– Julie Heldman, April 6, 2012

source: http://www.wtatennis.com/news/article/2733273/title/gladys-heldman-a-daughters-perspective

 

Do Tall Women Have a Better Chance to Succeed at Tennis?

Recently a group of tennis professionals were talking about how they thought female professional athletes were taller than the average population. One of the questions raised in the discussion was, “Can shorter females realistically aspire to play tennis at a highly competitive or professional level?”

As a result, the height of the 128 women participants at Wimbledon 2014 was collected from online websites and the distribution and average heights were calculated.

The women players at Wimbledon 2014 were taller than the general female population. On average (mean, median, mode) the Wimbledon participants were 5’9”. This compares to an average of 5’4″ for the U.S. (CDC).

  • 21.1% of the women professionals who played at Wimbledon 2014 were 5’6” or shorter.
  • 68.0% of the women professionals who played at Wimbledon 2014 were between 5’7” and 5’11”.
  • 10.9% of the women professionals who played at Wimbledon 2014 were 6’0” or taller.
  • The shortest player was Kurumi Nara and the tallest players were Maria Sharapova and Naomi Broady.

While it is possible for shorter females to play tennis at a highly competitive level, tall women are more likely to succeed.

tall women at Wimbledon 2014

 

 

American Junior Boys Have Stellar Performance at Wimbledon

After a subpar performance at the French Open, the American junior boys were dominant at Wimbledon. It’s about time!

On the other hand the girls fared slightly better than at Roland Garros, which isn’t saying much.

Overall the boys won 22 matches while losing 8 and the girls won 8 matches and lost 9.

Henrik Wiersholm and Dennis Uspensky were the only two American junior boys to lose in the first round. The remaining 7 boys won their first and second round matches.

Francis Tiafoe, Alex Rybakov, Michael Mmoh, and Logan Smith lost in the third round.

Three of the semifinalists were Americans: Noah Rubin, Taylor Harry Fritz, and Stefan Kozlov. Rubin beat Fritz in his semis matches before losing to Kozlov in the finals. At the French Open Kozlov lost in the quarterfinals, while Rubin was downed in the second round. With good fortune, his strong play will carry over into the U.S. Open.

In the girls draw, Kaitlyn McCarty, Katrine Steffensen, Raveeena Kingsley, Usae Maitane Arconada, and Catherine Bellis lost in the first round. Dasha Ivanova and Sofia Kenin dropped their second round matches.

Tornado Alicia Black and Michaela Gorden won three matches before being eliminated in the quarterfinals.

Congratulations to the entire group of American junior boys and girls. A special tip of the hat goes to Koslov, Rubin, and Fritz. Hopefully, this strong showing is not an anomaly, but a sign of things to come for American tennis.

USTA Player Development MIA at Wimbledon

There was something different about the results for the men’s and women’s draw at Wimbledon 2014 – No American advanced past the third round in the singles. In fact, only one American man and five women made it to the third round.

Sadly, the embarrassing showing of the Americans made their abysmal showing at the French Open look somewhat respectable. Even worse, Wimbledon is a tournament where the Americans usually play well.

Clearly, the results of the men and women accentuate the fact that the USTA Player Development has been MIA for a number of years. The program may be taking credit for developing players, but it is not producing elite players at the international level.

On the men’s side, John Isner was the only player to have a winning record. He exited in the third round.

Sam Querrey, Jack Sock, and Denis Kudla all lost in the second round after winning a match. Bradley Klahn, Steve Johnson, AlexKuznetsov, Ryan Harrison, Donald Young, and Michael Russell were all first round losers.

The men won 5 matches and lost 10. In other words, if the American men had combined all of their wins and allocated them to one player, they would have lost in the semifinals.

The American men are excellent players; however, with the exception of Isner and Querry, they are ranked closer to 100 than number 1. The player development programs of other countries appear to have aspirations for greatness that exceed those of the USTA Player Development program.

Memo #1 to USTA Player Development.
Topic: There were no American men players in the round of 16.

The following countries had multiple players in the round of 16:
• Spain – 3
• France – 2
• Switzerland – 2
The following countries had one player in the 16s: Argentina, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Canada, Great Britain, Japan, Serbia, and South Africa. The player from Serbia won the tournament.

There were 13 Americans in the women’s draw. Combined, they won 13 matches and lost 13.

The first round losers included: Anna Tatishvili, Christina McHale, Taylor Townsend, Sloane Stephens, and Vania King. They were joined on the sidelines by second round losers Victoria Duval, Coco Vandeweghe, and Varvara Lepchenko.

The following American women won two matches before exiting the tournament: Serena Williams, Alison Riske, Madison Keys, Venus Williams, and Lauren Davis. Game over for the women!

The recent American youngsters to appear on the big stage are finding that life is tougher than it looks like from the sidelines.

Memo #2 to USTA Player Development.
Topic: There were no American women players in the round of 16.

The following countries had multiple playing in the Round of 16:
• Czechoslovakia – 4
• Germany -2
• Russia – 2
• Kazakhstan – 2
The following countries had one player in the 16s: Canada, China, Denmark, France, Poland, and Romania. One of the players from Czechoslovakia was the winner.

Wimbledon 2014 confirmed what was expected last summer. At that time it appeared there were either an inordinate number of upsets or a changing of the guard. The recent results confirmed the latter has occurred.  Halep, Bouchard, Kvitova, and the host of other young players have begun to take over the top spots in the women’s game.

Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer, still control the men’s sport, but the youngsters are rattling their sabers that change is on the horizon in the not too distant future.

Hopefully the leaders of the USTA and the USTA Player Development Program were watching. Wimbledon is much more fun to watch when Americans are playing in the finals!

2014 Hot Dog Eating Contest Results

The 2014 International Hot Dog Eating Contest is a long-standing Fourth of July custom at Coney Island. ESPN was there to cover the event, although it more closely resembled a P.T. Barnum circus than a sporting event.

Two-time winner Sonya Thomas, aka the “Black Widow” wasn’t able to muster up a win this year. She was dethroned by Miki Sudo who downed 34 dogs and buns. Sudo will look great in her pink winner’s belt.

Thomas barely snatched second place with 27.75 dogs and buns, just .75 ahead of Michelle Lesco. Now that’s close!

Prior to the Men’s contest Joey Chestnut stole the show by proposing to his girlfriend. What kind of guy would propose to his girlfriend at a hot dog eating contest? Even worse, what kind of woman would say yes to such a guy?Engagement ring at hot dog eating contest

Chestnut returned home from the contest with his 8th consecutive title, a gaudy mustard colored belt, and a fiancée. Even better, he completed his trifecta without getting any mustard on her ring.

Chestnut won by a landslide with 61 franks and buns followed by Matt Stonie with 56 and Tim Janus with 44.

Both the men’s and women’s event each had one intelligent entrant. Colin Shirlow and Val Bromann finished dead last in their respective events, eating only 3 frankfurters and buns.

Stay tuned for the 2015 July 4th event, same time, same location, same dogs, same buns. Will married life prevent Chestnut from winning 9 in a row? Will Chestnut still be married? Has the Black Widow lost her touch? Will someone eat fewer than 3 hot dogs and buns? Does anyone really care?

 

High School vs Club Sports, the Battles Rages On

The high school vs club sports battle rages on, with the most recent flare-up touching the baseball diamonds of Colorado.

The following comments are excerpted from an article by Paul Willis in the June 28th Boulder Daily Camera. The article “Baseball: Area high school programs fighting club-team takeover – Increasing club presence could de-emphasize varsity season, coaches fear”.

The excerpt follows:

 “The more Scott Weiss considers the club baseball scene, the more his blood boils.

The Monarch coach isn’t alone. Several other prominent coaches in the area share his concerns, with some believing the club scene soon could invade the varsity season, much like it already has in soccer and hockey.

The value assigned to Colorado high school baseball is in peril, many coaches recognize, and in need of some reconstruction to combat the encroaching club presence.

It’s a slippery slope. Clearly, not all club baseball teams are disreputable. But in the shady underbelly of the circuit, deplorable tactics are abundant. False promises of prime exposure, low-brow recruiting measures and several additional dangled carrots designed to lure an athlete away from his team’s summer program.

“We’ve been talking about it the past few years that these club teams, they’re getting into these kids’ heads, and they’re buying into it,” Longmont coach Tom Fobes said. “Some of them are good, but the majority, I don’t see the benefit.”

Monarch is fielding only a Legion B squad this summer, because most of the Coyotes’ marquee athletes have fled to the purported greener pastures of the club scene.

“I’m all for our kids getting varied coaching, different points of view and becoming better baseball players,” Weiss said. “But what happens with some of these club teams is, they go about their business in a way that they’re trying to discredit the high school coaches.

“They tell kids that they need to play with them in order to get better or get a college scholarship. It’s a big sales pitch that’s put on, and it creates a lot of tension between the high schools and the club teams — and the parents and the kids.”

Make no mistake, high school programs are fighting back, with Fairview coach Rick Harig spearheading an effort to overhaul the current high school landscape, which clearly is a decade or two behind states such as Texas and Florida.”

The coaches quoted in the article appear to be knowledgeable, highly regarded, and passionate about their sports. Hats off to them for having a positive impact on the youth of Colorado.

These coaches correctly spotted the trend that high school sports are not as relevant as they were 25 years ago and that club sports have become more relevant. Right or wrong, times have changed. It is GAME OVER for the good old days.

These changes have occurred for a variety of reasons such as funding cuts for education, a poor economy, weak school programs, policies that are unfavorable to athletic programs, and overzealous parents and club directors.

Along the way there are plenty of horror stories, as suggested by the article. Both club and high programs are guilty.

For example, some private coaches for individual sports don’t want “their” athletes “wasting their time” high school programs. In some cases, high school coaches have banned their athletes from cross training or playing club sports during “their” season. Unfortunately, the list goes on and on.

These disagreements are unnecessary, as most high school and clubs claim to be looking out for “their” athletes. The bottom line is that some of the coaches and programs have chosen to make themselves the focal point, rather than focusing on the athletes.

That is the real problem!

 

 

 

 

Pocket Radar – More than a Speed Gun for Tennis Serves

According to Wikipedia Samuel Groth hit the fastest recorded tennis serve at 163.7 mph. Venus Williams tops the list for women at 129.0 mph.

How fast can you hit your tennis serve?

Too often sports enthusiasts think that speed guns, such as Pocket Radar, can only be used to measure the speed of serves. With a little imagination Pocket Radar can be used in a variety of ways to teach tennis players the subtleties of the sport, not just the speed of their serves. Some examples follow:

A. Compare the speed for the forehand and backhand groundstrokes. Most players hit their forehands with greater pace.
• Are their technical or physical reasons the backhand is hit with less pace?
• What are the tactical implications of being able to hit one groundstroke at a faster pace than the other? – For example, if the backhand is hit with less pace, should a player try to place it, keep it in play, and create offense with the forehand?

B. Compare the speed of groundstrokes based on the spin (topspin, flat, underspin).
• Generally speaking, these results will have tactical implications. When is it appropriate to hit with topspin? Underspin? What is the proper mix of spin and pace? What type of spin is best for keeping the ball in play? What type of spin is best for trying to hit a ball past the opponent?pocket radar

C. Compare the speed of groundstrokes based on the angle of the shot.
• Again, there may be technical and tactical reasons for a variation in the pace of the ball based on its angle. Usually a sharply angled ball will be hit with less pace because it may be hit with a shorter backswing or it is hit with more spin to ensure control. The purpose of a sharply angled ball is to hit it away from the opponent. In many cases, pace is not necessary to win the point.

D. Measure the pace of the serve to the deuce and ad service courts? Most likely players can hit to one court at a faster speed. For examples, righties may be able to hit harder to the deuce court.
• Are there technical or physical reasons for the difference in speed to the two courts? For example, righties may have to hit with more spin to the ad court, which could decrease the speed of the serve.
• What are the tactical implications – For example: should righties go for more aces in the deuce court, while using placement and consistency to win points in the ad court?
At a more advanced level, the speed of a serve can be measured to the inside corner, outside corner, and “at the body” for both courts. Again, the variation in speed for these six locations may have technical, physical, and tactical implications.

E. Compare the speed for serves or groundstrokes over time.
• It is virtually impossible to increase the pace of any shot overnight. There are many reasons to measure the pace of a specific shot over time. For example, this may be a way to measure how a person is recovering from an injury, it may show the effects of participating in a strength/agility/fitness program, or it may show the effects of taking lessons to improve a specific technique. Small changes may occur over months, rather than weeks or days.

It is fun to coach with software and technology devices, such as Pocket Radar. They provide another way of helping students understand how to play the sport and make it more fun!

So, how fast is your serve?

USTA Player Development Program – Subpar Performance of American Juniors at French Open

The pattern of subpar performance of American open junior was evident at the 2014 French Open – yet another sign of the ineffectiveness of the USTA Player Development Program.

Some argue the issue is the clay at Roland Garros, not the leadership within the USTA. American players have not fared as well at the French Open as other Grand Slam events. The American men have only won the event four times in the open Era  (47 years) while the women have won it fourteen times (Chris Evert won it seven times).

The seven American boys started the 2014 French Open on a positive note winning their first round matches (Francis Tiafoe, Noah Rubin, Alex Rybakov, Michael Mmoh, Stefan Kozlov, Henrik Wiersholm, and Taylor Harry Fritz). Unfortunately, Kozlov was the only player to advance beyond the second round.

Kozlov eventually won three matches before bowing out in the quarterfinals. With the strong first round performance, the American Boys won nine matches and lost eight.

The performance by the girls was the weakest in years. Katrine Steffensen, Tornado Alicia Black, Sofia Kenin, Riveena Kingsley, and Dasha Invanova all lost first round matches. Usue Maitane Arconada won a match before exiting in the second round and Catherine Bellis won two matches before bowing out in the third round.

Overall, the girls won three matches and lost seven.

At best, the USTA Player Development Program has been ineffective. By comparison a player from Spain has won the men’s French Open fourteen times in the past 21 years, i.e. the Open Era. During this period players from Spain have not been in the finals on only six occasions (1995 to 1997, 2000, 2004, and 2009).

On four occasions both finalists were from Spain on four occasions (1994, 1998, 2002, and 2013). Rafael Nadal played in only one of those four all-Spanish finals.

The Spanish women have won four French Opens during the open era. Despite the increased popularity of tennis around the world, It seems like the Royal Spanish Tennis Federation has figured out a way to produce world-class tennis players. Hopefully, the leaders of the USTA Player Development Program have taken notice.