Two Points a Set – CU’s Long and Winding Road to Improvement

Since 2007, the University of Colorado Women’s Volleyball program has been challenged to put a team on the court that wins in conference play. This post presents data that documents the improvement made by the Lady Buffs from 2009 to 2014.

Background

In 2006 the Lady Buffs won 49.5% of the points in conference competition, they qualified for the NCAA Championships, and were ousted in the second round. Data for 2006 and 2007 are not included in this discussion because sets were played to 30 points at that time.

In 2007 CU only won a single conference match with virtually the same team that had won the first round in the 2006 NCAA Championships.

In 2008, the rules were changed and sets were played to 25 points. The fortunes of the Lady Buffs improved slightly – they won seven matches.

In 2009 changes were made in the CU program and Liz Kritza took over as coach. Her teams won six out of 62 matches in her first three seasons.

The Buffs switched to the PAC-12 Conference in 2011.

In the inaugural PAC-12 season there were 22 conference matches. For purposes of discussion in this post, the data for 2011 has been adjusted to make it comparable to other years. Twenty matches were played in 2012 and subsequent years.

In 2012 the Lady Buffs won four of twenty matches. They were victors half the time when their 2013 and 2014 totals are combined.

Results

The 2009 conference season was abysmal. The Lady Buffs were not competitive – they won their fewest number of points (1,205) and lost their least number of points (1,609).

To become a competitive team it was necessary for the Lady Buffs to win more points. At the same time they needed to lose fewer points.

As can be seen by fast forwarding to 2014, the Lady Buffs have made progress. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE HOW SLOW THAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN.

They won half the points played in 2014, were 11-9 in conference play, qualified for the NCAA Championships, and won their first round match. For the sake of comparison, the 2014 points won/lost for CU, Stanford, and Nebraska follow:
• CU 1,651 points won and 1,648 points lost.
• Stanford 1,774 points won and 1,493 points lost. Stanford lost in the NCAA semis to champion Penn State.
• Nebraska 1,633 points won and 1,500 points lost. Nebraska lost in the NCAA quarters to finalist BYU.

As can be seen, the Lady Buffs are half-way to becoming an elite team. They are now winning about 1,600 points per season. Unfortunately, they have consistently lost at least 1,600 points per season since 2008. That total will have to be reduced to about 1,500 for CU to move to the next level.

Year Points Won Points Lost % Points Won Record
2008 1,512 1,707 47.0% 7-13
2009 1,205 1,609 42.8% 2-18
2010 1,302 1,639 44.3% 3-17
2011 adjusted 1,304 1,629 44.5% 1-21
2012 1,354 1,655 45.0% 4-16
2013 1,516 1,635 48.1% 9-11
2014 1,651 1,648 50.0% 11-9

Points Won by Year

In 2008 the Lady Buffs won 1,512 points. Point production dropped to 1,205 when the team cratered in 2009. It didn’t return to the 2008 level until 2013 when the team reached 1,516 points.

Year Points Won Difference Prior Year Avg. Diff. Points/Match Avg. Diff. Points/Set
2008 1,512
2009 1,205 -307 -15.4 -4.7
2010 1,302 97 4.9 1.3
2012 1,354 50 2.5 0.7
2013 1,516 162 8.1 2.2
2014 1,651 135 6.8 1.7

There was little change in the points won between 2010 and 2012. On average the Lady Buffs found a way to win 7-8 additional points each match or about 2 additional points per set throughout both the 2013 and 2014 seasons.

TWO POINTS A SET! That sounds so easy.

The data shows there is a fine line between the number of points won for a 4-16 team, a 9-11 team, and a team with an 11-9 record. For additional information, see the report Team Tendencies and the Importance of Winning a Point.

Two Points a Set

Women’s Volleyball Team Tendencies

The women’s volleyball scores for the University of Colorado were evaluated for the nine-year period 2006 to 2014. In addition, scores were included for select Nebraska and Stanford seasons. From this analysis points won, sets won, and matches won, the following team tendencies were developed.

The following definitions are used in the description of the different levels.
Blowouts – decided by 10 points or more.
Solid – decided by 5 to 9 points.
Competitive – decided by 3 or 4 points.
Close – decided by 2 points.

Tier I Teams
• Win more than 53% of the points.
• Don’t lose blowout sets and less than 10% of sets are solid losses. They don’t give opponents a chance to get into the match.
• Win a majority of the close and competitive sets.
• At least 35% of the sets are solid wins
• At least 10% of the sets are blowout wins.
• Win at least 80% of their matches and most wins are 3-0.

Tier II Teams
• Win between 50.1% and 53.0% of the points.
• May lose a few blowout and solid loss sets.
• Win a majority of close and competitive matches.
• About 30% of their sets are solid wins and 5% are blowouts.
• Win at least 66% of their matches and most wins are 3-0 or 3-1.

Tier III Teams
• Win 48.1% to 50% of the points.
• Less than 10% of sets lost are blowouts and 20% solid losses.
• Sometimes win a majority of the close and competitive matches.
• Win about 20% of the sets are solid wins
• May win a few blowout sets.
• Win about half their matches.

Tier IV Teams
• Win between 45.1% and 48% of the points.
• About 20% of their sets are blowouts and 25% are solid loses.
• Most losses are 3-0 or 3-1.
• Win about 35% of their sets and matches.

Tier V Teams
• Win less than 45.1% of their points.
• More than half their sets are solid losses or blowouts.
• A majority of their matches are lost 3-0.
• Win less than 30% of their matches.

The above hierarchy will allow coaches to identify where their team falls in the peaking order and provide them with coaching that will help them move up the pecking order.

For additional information, click here and go to the report Team Tendencies and the Importance of Winning a Point.

NCAA Volleyball Quarterfinalists Represent 24 States and 5 Countries

The Big 12 and the PAC 12 conferences dominated the NCAA Women’s Volleyball Championships. Teams from their conferences filled 7 of the 8 quarterfinal slots. Texas was the only school from another conference.

This brief analysis identifies the home states of the most active players from the teams in the quarterfinals. Information was gathered from the rosters and stats pages of the school’s athletic department websites. Only players were included in this analysis that played more than half the sets during the season.

 Team  Number of Players Playing Playing More Than Half of the Sets in 2013  Number of Players Playing Sets in 2013 Season
Nebraska  9 15
Penn State  10 18
Purdue  11 13
Stanford  8 15
Texas 10 13
USC 11 15
Washington  9 12
Wisconsin  9 13
  Total  77  114

 

The following two tables identify the home countries and states for the quarterfinalists. The first table looks at the location by country and the second table identifies the home state for the U.S. players.

There were only 5 foreign players at four schools. Four of the quarterfinalists had all players from the U.S.

NU

PSU

Purdue

Stanford

Texas

USC

U of W

Wisconsin

Total

Italy

1

1

Mexico

1

1

PuertoRico

1

1

2

Sweden

1

1

U.S.

8

9

11

8

10

9

8

9

72

 Total

9

10

11

8

10

11

9

9

77

 

The rosters of most teams included players from within their regions. For example Purdue has 6 players from Indiana and USC had five players from California.

Of the 72 players from the U.S., 15 were from California, 11 from Texas, 9 from Illinois and 7 from Indiana.

Five of the 8 schools have players from California, 6 schools have players from Texas, and 4 schools have players from Illinois.

Although about 60% of the players are from 4 states, the key players from the quarterfinalists were from 24 states.

 

NU

PSU

Purdue

Stanford

Texas

USC

U of W

Wisconsin

Total

 AL    

1

         

1

 AR

1

1

CA

1

1

4

5

4

15

 CO

1

1

 FL

1

1

 HI

2

2

 IA

1

1

 IL

2

2

1

4

9

 IN

6

1

7

 KY

1

1

 LA

1

1

 MD

1

1

 MI

1

1

 MN

2

2

 MO

1

1

 NB

2

2

 NC

1

1

1

3

 NJ

1

1

 NY

1

1

 OH

2

1

3

 OK

1

1

2

 OR

2

2

 TX

1

1

1

5

2

1

11

 WA        

1

1

 

2

 TOTAL

8

9

11

8

10

9

8

9

72

 

The data illustrates that quality programs are developing high performance players in most parts of the country.

 

Buffs Volleyball Attendance on the Rise

The University of Colorado became a member of the PAC 12 Conference in 2010 and began competition in 2011. In most sports, the Buffs demonstrated they were not ready for prime time. Volleyball was no exception.

The Lady Buffs won only 1 of 22 matches in their first season. The home court was marginally more friendly to the Buffs than the road. They lost eight matches by a score of 3-0 and won a total of 5 sets in the friendly confines of the Coors Event Center. On a positive note, they won their only conference match at home.

Only once during the season were more than 1,000 people in attendance at the matches in 2011.

 

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Sep-13 Utah

0-3

508

Sep-23 Oregon

0-3

507

Sep-24 Oregon State

0-3

483

Sep-30 USC

0-3

923

Oct-2 UCLA

0-3

710

Oct-14 Arizona

0-3

923

Oct-15 Arizona State

0-3

643

Nov-3 Stanford

1-3

686

Nov-5 California

1-3

2,060

Nov-18 Washington State

3-2

635

Nov-19 Washington

0-3

876

Home Conference Record

1-10

Conference Record

1-21

Average Attendance

814

The 2012 season was marginally better. The Lady Buffs lost all their road matches, but won 4 home matches. Through increased promotional efforts and greater interest in the team, attendance surpassed 1,000 on four occasions.

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Sep-19 Utah

3-0

415

Sep-22 California

2-3

704

Oct-5 Washington State

3-0

757

Oct-7 Washington

0-3

712

Oct-12 Arizona State

3-2

3,117

Oct-14 Arizona

1-3

2,851

Oct-26 Oregon

0-3

701

Oct-28 Oregon State

3-1

607

Nov-9 UCLA

0-3

1,257

Nov-10 USC

0-3

1,140

Home Conference Record

4-6

Conference Record

4-16

Average Attendance

1,226

On the court, the 2013 season was a breakthrough year as the Lady Buffs posted a winning home record.

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Sep-27 UCLA 3-2

2,777

Oct-4 Washington 3-1

873

Oct-6 Washington State 3-1

851

Oct-25 Arizona 3-0

784

Oct-27 Arizona State 3-1

618

Nov-8 Stanford 0-3

1,562

Nov-9 California 1-3

1,127

Nov-22 Oregon State 3-0

863

Nov-24 Oregon 1-3

1,270

Nov-27 Utah 3-2

967

Home Conference Record

7-3

Conference Record

9-11

Average Attendance

1,169

The Lady Buffs have made progress; both on the courts and in the promotion of the program; however, the University of Washington has set a benchmark for CU and other conference members.

In addition to winning the 2013 PAC-12 title, the Huskies average attendance was over 3,800. Only twice was their home attendance less than 2,000.

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Oct-11 Arizona 3-1

4,589

Oct-13 Arizona State 3-0

2,188

Oct-16 California 3-0

1,525

Oct-20 Stanford 3-2

4,914

Nov-1 Utah 3-1

2,115

Nov-3 Colorado 3-0

2,880

Nov-13 UCLA 3-0

1,734

Nov-15 USC 3-1

4,274

Nov-27 Oregon State 3-1

2,139

Nov-29 Washington State 3-0

3,811

Home Conference Record

10-0

Conference Record

18-2

Average Attendance

2,842

Best wishes to the Buffs for a productive offseason and for continued improvement in 2014.

Buffs volleyball attendance on the rise
Nicole Edleman sets Kerra Schroeder in warmups

NCAA Volleyball – 33 Years in a Row for Stanford and Penn State

There was a time when baseball fans hollered, “Break up the Yankees.” At the time, it was an understatement to say that the Bronx Bombers were dominant.

If these anti-Yankee folks were women’s volleyball fans today they would say, “Break up the Penn State and Stanford programs.”

The first NCAA championships were held in 1981. In the 33 championships, including this season, Penn State and Stanford are the only two teams to appear in every NCAA tournament. That type of dominance makes the New York Yankees look as inept as the Chicago Cubs.

Over the past 33 seasons, Stanford has won 6 NCAA national championships and was runner-up on 8 occasions. As well, they had three undefeated conference seasons.

Since 1981, the overall winning percentage for the Cardinal fell below 65% twice. Their conference winning percentage dropped below that mark only once.

Penn State has been equally as impressive. They won 5 national championships and were runner-up on 3 occasions. They won the national championship four consecutive years (2007 – 2010) and were undefeated in two of those seasons.

As well, they were undefeated in conference play 14 times. Only once did the Penn State overall season winning percentage drop below 65%.

33 years in a row
Sunday evening Texas was announced as the number one seed for the 2013 NCAA tournament. They are the outright favorite to defend their title.

Penn State was seeded second and Stanford was seeded seventh. If they both win their first three matches they will face off in the quarterfinals.

Here’s to an exciting NCAA tournament!