Best College Tennis Players in Country Go Unnoticed in Boulder

The best college tennis players in the country recently went unnoticed in Boulder. The  city has a poor track record of supporting (watching) great sports performances.  Boulderites would rather play than watch – which isn’t all bad.

Over a 10 day period (March 14th to March 24th) Colorado tennis fans had an opportunity to see the future of American women’s professional tennis in Boulder as the 74th-ranked Lady Buffs tennis team played USC (12th), Cal (16th), UCLA (2), and Stanford (4). Eleven of the PAC-12 visiting opponents are currently in the top 30 of the ITA singles rankings.

Zoe Scandalis, #1 Player USC, against CU Buffs. Scandalis is one of the top college tennis players in the country.
Zoe Scandalis, #1 Player, University of Southern California, in match against CU Lady Buffs.

The USC powerhouse is led by #1 player Zoe Scandalis (see photo) and includes a group of 9 elite junior players from California and 1 player from Mississippi. All were highly-ranked junior players who participated in a variety of USTA programs.

On the other hand Cal’s team is comprised of a mix of accomplished American and International players. For example, Hungarian Zsofi Susanyi, #3 singles player, advanced to the singles finals at the 2009 Junior Wimbledon.

The Stanford team includes 5 Californians, two East Coast players, and a Canadian. Three of the six players (Krista Hardebeck, Carol Zhao, and Carolyn Doyle) played in various junior Grand Slams and Kristie Ahn, #1 player, played in the main draw of the U.S. Open.

UCLA is coached by Stella Sampras, older sister of Pete Sampras. All six Bruin players (Robin Anderson, Jennifer Brady, Catherine Harrison, Chanelle Van Nguyen, Kyle McPhillips, and Courtney Dolehide) played in multiple junior Grand Slam events. In addition, one player played in the main draw of the U.S. Open. All of the players except Dolehide are currently in the top 50 of the singles ITA rankings.

It is disappointing that there weren’t more people in attendance to watch some great college tennis by the Buffs and their opponents. (Average estimated attendance for the four matches was less than 200 people.)

It is an even greater travesty that the Colorado tennis community doesn’t give the Lady Buffs the ongoing support the team deserves!

 

 

If You Were the Buffs AD, Would You Spend $143 Million?

CU Athletics recently announced plans to spend $143 million to update its facilities. In an email sent under Rick George’s name, this expenditure was explained in the following way:

“Our Sustainable Excellence Initiative (SEI), which includes a $143 million wide-ranging facilities improvement plan, was approved unanimously by the Board of Regents on December 4. This is the vital component to our strategic plan, one that reaches out past the year 2025, which will be finalized by the end of January. We have determined what our vision and mission are:

“To be nationally recognized as a premier athletics department, by providing a world-class and holistic student-athlete experience, operating in a fiscally responsible manner, while consistently competing for and winning championships.”

The comprehensive student-athlete experience includes enhancing our academic, health and wellness, and personal development programs, in concert with raising the level of competitive excellence for all teams to compete for and win championships on the conference and national levels. Developing and renovating facilities is the key factor in achieving the above objectives.

We are working diligently to make this a reality, not a pipe dream. We intend to start construction this Spring with a completion date in time for the start of the 2015-16 academic and athletic year; yes, an aggressive remake of our athletic department in what basically is a 16-month window.”$143 milliom

CU Athletics submitted their proposal directly to the Board of Regents instead of initially having it approved by the campus planning committee. Technically this is not a problem, but George’s actions may not sit well with some members of a community that does not fully support the Buffs.

It is presumed that George’s rush for approval is driven by clauses in Coach McIntyre’s contract that require CU to initiate plans for facility improvements by the end of the year and to complete those upgrades by a certain date. Said differently, the cost of hiring coach Mac contractually extends well beyond his monthly wages and incentives.

CU is faced with a self-induced conundrum. They are in an athletic arms race they cannot afford to be in. The expenditure of $143 million is necessary for them to continue to participate. On a comparative basis, many of their facilities are subpar. Unfortunately, spending $143 million is a band-aid that will not provide the program with a long-term competitive advantage. At best, it will temporarily reduce the gap between the Buffs and the top schools.

This issue could be addressed by re-focusing the purpose of athletics at CU. That won’t happen.

Like most universities, CU has chosen to expand their athletic empire. Good arguments can be made for de-emphasis or expansion; however, most college presidents endorse the rationale for having a strong presence in athletics.

What does $143 million mean to other organizations?

  • The website of Johnson and Wales University indicated that JWU increased student aid to $143 million for 2012-13.
  • The Bleacher Report stated that Alabama reported $143 million in athletic revenue during 2012-2013. This is an increase of about $20 million from the prior year when they were ranked 4th in the country for revenue. Alabama listed a surplus of $21.1 million. (Note: By comparison, a November 6th article in the Daily Camera stated that CU Athletics is more than $21 million in debt to the university and facing a shortfall of $5.6 million to budget this fiscal year).
  • In December, the sale of Frontier Airlines to Indigo Partners was finalized for $145 million.
  • Senior Housing News reported that American Realty Capital has agreed to purchase a nine-property portfolio of assisted living communities and development land for a total of $143 million. The eight communities and one development parcel are all based in the southeast and include 453 assisted living units and 187 memory care units.
  • In late September the Alabama State Port Authority approved a $143.8 million budget Tuesday for the upcoming fiscal year.
  • In the Q2 2013 Digital Startup Report published by Builtinchicago.com it was announced that 37 startups raised $146 million dollars in the second quarter of 2013.
  • In August, the New York Times announced the opening of North Atlanta High School, the most expensive high school ever built in Georgia.  The 11-story high school, with a 900 car parking garage cost $147 million.
  • In November of 2013, a Francis Bacon painting sold for $142 million.
  • The Illinois extension office released data indicating that in 2008 the major pumpkin producing states (Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and California) produced 1.1 billion pounds of pumpkins values at $141 million.
  • In April 2012, President Obama ended a six-month funding freeze to Palestine. He released $147 million to pay for infrastructure, education, humanitarian aid and health projects.

What does $143 million mean to you? Is CU’s decision to spend $143 million a necessary and responsible expenditure? How would you respond to CU’s athletic arms conundrum if you were the Buff’s AD?

 

Buffs Volleyball Attendance on the Rise

The University of Colorado became a member of the PAC 12 Conference in 2010 and began competition in 2011. In most sports, the Buffs demonstrated they were not ready for prime time. Volleyball was no exception.

The Lady Buffs won only 1 of 22 matches in their first season. The home court was marginally more friendly to the Buffs than the road. They lost eight matches by a score of 3-0 and won a total of 5 sets in the friendly confines of the Coors Event Center. On a positive note, they won their only conference match at home.

Only once during the season were more than 1,000 people in attendance at the matches in 2011.

 

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Sep-13 Utah

0-3

508

Sep-23 Oregon

0-3

507

Sep-24 Oregon State

0-3

483

Sep-30 USC

0-3

923

Oct-2 UCLA

0-3

710

Oct-14 Arizona

0-3

923

Oct-15 Arizona State

0-3

643

Nov-3 Stanford

1-3

686

Nov-5 California

1-3

2,060

Nov-18 Washington State

3-2

635

Nov-19 Washington

0-3

876

Home Conference Record

1-10

Conference Record

1-21

Average Attendance

814

The 2012 season was marginally better. The Lady Buffs lost all their road matches, but won 4 home matches. Through increased promotional efforts and greater interest in the team, attendance surpassed 1,000 on four occasions.

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Sep-19 Utah

3-0

415

Sep-22 California

2-3

704

Oct-5 Washington State

3-0

757

Oct-7 Washington

0-3

712

Oct-12 Arizona State

3-2

3,117

Oct-14 Arizona

1-3

2,851

Oct-26 Oregon

0-3

701

Oct-28 Oregon State

3-1

607

Nov-9 UCLA

0-3

1,257

Nov-10 USC

0-3

1,140

Home Conference Record

4-6

Conference Record

4-16

Average Attendance

1,226

On the court, the 2013 season was a breakthrough year as the Lady Buffs posted a winning home record.

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Sep-27 UCLA 3-2

2,777

Oct-4 Washington 3-1

873

Oct-6 Washington State 3-1

851

Oct-25 Arizona 3-0

784

Oct-27 Arizona State 3-1

618

Nov-8 Stanford 0-3

1,562

Nov-9 California 1-3

1,127

Nov-22 Oregon State 3-0

863

Nov-24 Oregon 1-3

1,270

Nov-27 Utah 3-2

967

Home Conference Record

7-3

Conference Record

9-11

Average Attendance

1,169

The Lady Buffs have made progress; both on the courts and in the promotion of the program; however, the University of Washington has set a benchmark for CU and other conference members.

In addition to winning the 2013 PAC-12 title, the Huskies average attendance was over 3,800. Only twice was their home attendance less than 2,000.

Date Opponent Score Attendance
Oct-11 Arizona 3-1

4,589

Oct-13 Arizona State 3-0

2,188

Oct-16 California 3-0

1,525

Oct-20 Stanford 3-2

4,914

Nov-1 Utah 3-1

2,115

Nov-3 Colorado 3-0

2,880

Nov-13 UCLA 3-0

1,734

Nov-15 USC 3-1

4,274

Nov-27 Oregon State 3-1

2,139

Nov-29 Washington State 3-0

3,811

Home Conference Record

10-0

Conference Record

18-2

Average Attendance

2,842

Best wishes to the Buffs for a productive offseason and for continued improvement in 2014.

Buffs volleyball attendance on the rise
Nicole Edleman sets Kerra Schroeder in warmups

Fans Find Better Things to Do than Watch Buffs Football

The primary goal of all Division I football teams is to put fannies in the seats and make donors want to contribute to the university.

The best way to accomplish this is to produce a winning team. The hard cold facts are that half the teams that play every Saturday are losers. Fans don’t support losing programs and Buffs football fans have found better things to do on Saturday afternoons than support the black and gold.

The Buffs finished the 2004 and 2005 seasons with 7-5 records. In 2004 they were 4-4 in the Big 12 and in 2005 they were 5-3. Oklahoma beat them 42-3 in the 2004 Big 12 Championships and Texas thumped them 70-3 the following year.

Many viewed these drubbings in the championships as a sign that CU was not capable of participating in the D1 football arms race without a sugar daddy. The CU administration viewed the losses differently. They used them as justification for hiring a new coach.

The Buffs football team has not had a winning season since 2005. Since then, they have had a 29-67 record, i.e. they have won only 30% of their games.

In 2011, the University of Colorado made a decision to move to the PAC 12 conference. Unfortunately the switch to a tougher conference did not positively impact the Buff’s performance on the field.

Their conference record for the past three seasons follows:

2011

  • 2-7 conference record
  • Home win over Arizona and a road win against Utah.

2012

  • 1-8 conference record
  • Road win over Washington State

2013

  • 1-8 conference record.
  • Home win over California.

The points for/against  Buffs football for the past three seasons follow:

2011

  • 5 home games                  127 points for                    183 points against
  • 4 away games                    51 points for                    193 points against
  • 9 total games                    178 points for                    376 points against
  • For every point scored by the Buffs, the opponents scored 2.11 points

2012

  • 5 home games                    69 points for                     221 points against
  • 4 away games                     86 points for                     210 points against
  • 9 total games                     155 points for                    431 points against
  • For every point scored by the Buffs, the opponents scored 2.78 points

2013

  • 4 home games                  106 points for                    172 points against
  • 5 away games                     77 points for                    226 points against
  • 9 total games                    183 points for                    398 points against
  • For every point scored by the Buffs, the opponents scored 2.11 points

Most Buffs football fans supported CU’s move to the PAC 12, they are less supportive of the product being rolled out at Folsom Field. In the past three years, the Buffs have won 2 of 14 home games and been outscored 2 to 1.

The Buffs conference home attendance for the past three seasons follows:

2011

The Buffs were 1-4 at home in conference play.

  • 9/10       49,532                   California
  • 10/1       51,928                   Washington State
  • 10/22     52,123                   Oregon
  • 11/4       50,083                   Southern California
  • 11/22     48,111                   Arizona.

Average conference home attendance 50,355.

2012
The Buffs were 0-5 at home in conference play.

  • 9/29       46,893                   UCLA
  • 10/11     45,161                   Arizona State
  • 10/27     44,138                   Stanford
  • 11/17     43,148                   Washington
  • 11/23     46,052                   Utah.

Average conference home attendance 45,078.

2013
The Buffs were 1-3 at home in conference play.

  • 10/5       45,944                   Oregon
  • 10/26     38,679                   Arizona
  • 11/16     38,252                   California
  • 11/23     36,005                   Southern California.

Average conference home attendance 39,720.

Hopefully, the most recent change in coaches bodes well for the Buffs football program!

 

 

 

Bowl Not Likely for CU Buffs!

Spin makes a bowling ball travel into the pocket for a strike, it makes a tennis serve curve into the court for an ace, and it allows media writers and sports information directors to say nice things when the home town team is losing.

Such was the case in Boulder this past weekend after the 3-3 CU Buffs downed Charleston Southern. The media reported, “3 more wins and the Buffs go bowling.”

The optimism was refreshing but, such foolishness belonged on the comics page.

Last year there was a chasm between the Buffs and their PAC-12 opponents. A year later the Golden Buffs have shown signs of improvement, but they still aren’t ready for Prime Time in the PAC 12.

Realistically, a respectable showing in the last six games will be great and a win against a solid PAC-12 team would be a major step forward. A road win would be stellar! Three wins are out of the picture. The Punch Bowl is the only bowl Chip and his football Buffs will see this season.

More importantly, the improving CU Buffs have not increased the number of fannies in the seats. After all, the financial bottom line is the most important part of major collegiate football programs. Go Buffs!

CU Buffs

Lady Buffs Volleyball Deserves Better Attendance!

Historically, University of Colorado Lady Buffs volleyball fans have been spoiled. The lady spikers have been a member of the Big 8, Big 12, and PAC -12, arguably the best volleyball conferences in the country.

Most years the Buffs have fielded a competitive team, on occasion they have upended nationally ranked teams, and they have infrequently paid a visit to the NCAA championships.

Given the competitiveness of the program it seems only logical that attendance at home matches would be strong. Unfortunately, Boulder is a town that loves sports, but in the case of volleyball, the locals would rather play it than watch it.

A total of only 12,261 people attended all 10 home PAC-12 games during the 2012 season. By comparison, the record number of people to attend a single men’s basketball game is 11,363. The individual game attendance for 2012 was:

  •    415                  Utah
  •    704                  California
  •    757                  Washington State
  •    712                  Washington
  • 3,117                  Arizona State
  • 2,851                  Arizona
  •    701                  Oregon
  •    607                  Oregon State
  • 1,257                  UCLA
  • 1,140                  USC

In 2012, CU was 4-16 in PAC-12 play; however, they were very competitive at home, winning 4 of the 10 matches in the Foam Dome, aka the Coors Event Center.

Average attendance was 1,226 spectators per home PAC 12 game, including two extremely popular promotional nights (In the photo below players hand out goodies to fairies and princesses prior to a Halloween promotional game). Without the promotional nights average attendance was 787 people.

There are still plenty of opportunities in the 2013 season to watch the Buff spikers compete against the best teams in the country. Go Lady Buffs Volleyball!

Lady Buffs Volleyball

 

Another Financially Draining Season for the CU Buffs

The CU Buffs natives are restless.

This past Saturday, the following conversation was heard between two University of Colorado football fans at the Flatirons Mall.

The first fan looked at his cell phone and said “I just received an update of the score for the game between Arizona State and CU. The Buffs are only down 47-6 at half.”

The second fan quipped “The Sun Devils will be starting the second string cheerleaders in the second half.”

To which the first fan responded, “It sounds like the second string cheerleaders might have started the game for ASU. Didn’t you hear me say that CU scored 6 points in the second quarter?”

It is going to be another long and financially draining football season for CU Athletics.

Is Sand Volleyball on the Horizon for CU and CSU?

In 2012 sand volleyball became an “emerging” women’s sport for the NCAA. Fifteen schools kicked off the inaugural season.  Another 15 teams were added this season (2013), with the National Championships on tap the first week in May.

On Friday April 26 CU and CSU put on a sand exhibition at Oasis Sports in Broomfield to increase awareness for the sport along the Front Range.  It appears that it is only a matter of time before the Rams and Buffs will be competing on the sand as part their respective NCAA athletic programs.

Should Scholarships be Granted for One or Four Years?

If you were a current or prospective college athlete, would you rather sign a one-year renewable scholarship contract or a four-year agreement?

Until this past spring, colleges could only offer one-year renewable agreements. In February, the NCAA changed the rule when college presidents voted to allow four-year contracts.

Interestingly enough, CU-Boulder voted against the measure. Acting in the true spirit of a research university, the Buff leadership polled its athletes and found they were overwhelmingly in favor of one-year renewable scholarships.

Buff athletes indicated that a lot can happen over the course of 4 years. Coaches can change, there is turnover among players, injuries occur, priorities change – in other words “Life Happens.” It was also felt that players would have greater commitment to the program if their contracts were renewed each year.

If an athlete isn’t performing or no longer fits in with the team, the coach should be able to help the student find a different situation that works to everyone’s benefit.

While there are some compelling arguments for the four-year scholarship contracts, hats off to the Buff athletes for their insight. The adminstration is also to be commended for seeking the opinions of its athletes and voting on the topic in the manner that best suited their wishes.